Archive for the ‘tangle’ Category

Cloud in Trousers

Friday, February 4th, 2011

A novelist (or at least the kind I aspire to be) is a cloud in trousers; ie, someone with no very fixed sense of identity, or with multiple personalities and views all shifting in or out of focus.

Amanda Craig.

When I was saying this, that is what I meant. Picture nabbed from the exellently named Cloud Appreciation Society.

Writers and their methods will be as various as the clouds themselves, but I read what Amanda said and nodded. How can I put myself in the shoes of all the people I want to write about (especially as it seems I can’t stop writing in first person) if I’ve solidified what I think about everything?

Does this make me an unfit member of society? Very possibly.

Second Thoughts

Monday, May 10th, 2010

Maybe I shouldn’t be taking pictures every day. Maybe I should be practising my writing instead. I need to get better than I am for me to be happy with my work, and sitting reading and doing other kinds of work might not be as good a way to get better at writing as writing would be.

Oh, but I do need a rest. I know what I want to write for the next one, but I don’t want to be sitting on my own and typing all the time just now.

I think I’m feeling a little worried because my friends are being very prolific all of a sudden. I’ve got word-count envy. Here’s a new magazine called Other by the novelist and blogger Socrates Adams. I think it’s going to be good. Bookmark it now.

Here’s an interview my friend Kim did with my other friend Tom about his new novel, The Leaping. It’s good too.

I’ve also been sorting through old interviews, short stories published on-line, guest blogs etc and deciding what I’m going to feature on my new website and what I’m going to let disappear. Reading through some of the stories linked to in the side-bar I am not so happy. I could do better now. I think I could have done better then if I’d have rested more and not been in such a rush to be a real writer.

The new website is going to be good. I’ve seen some ‘mock-ups’ so far and it looks very exciting. I will be blogging at the new website too, so soon people who read this blog will have to change their bookmarks or point their feed-readers somewhere else. Don’t worry. I will give ample and frequent warning.

I should be doing some magazines or new stories or the first draft of book three. I should be typing furiously. I feel racked with guilt.

On Compromise and Stilton Jars

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

This is a kind of follow-on to my last post, which was about working within boundaries – both as a creative writer, and as someone who works on creative writing projects and teaches creative writing to others.

It was about the way I feel that boundaries can either shape or stifle the work, and me feeling a bit uncomfortable about setting other people boundaries – even though I know I can be very creative inside some rules myself and I know that sometimes writers appreciate a brief, a nudge in the right direction, a set of guidelines to bump up against.

I still haven’t found an answer to that one – still haven’t decided how I feel, other than ‘it depends’.

This post is about compromise, which is related, I think. Doing creative work might seem to be full of kicks and freedom and a world away from the 9-5 drudge you do for a boss, but in actual fact it is often a series of compromises between what I would like to do, and what the funders require – what I think is best or most effective, and what ticks the right boxes. Sometimes this means working really creatively on developing and delivering a project that ticks everyone’s boxes (that idea of boundaries being inspiring again) and sometimes, it doesn’t. Sometimes is means he who pays the piper calls the tune.

I’ve not been doing freelance work (writer-for-hire) long enough to be able to tell how these compromises are going to feel to me before I start, although I’m learning that the amount of compromise involved is important to me. Because when the compromise is too much, I start to feel bad. I feel dishonest, or like I don’t want to be associated with the product because it’s too far away from the way I think it should have been done. I’ve been mainly lucky so far with this.

And what about my own writing? I can write what I like, and most of the time I do. When I was writing A Kind of Intimacy I hoped but did not expect to get it published, and that gave me a lot of freedom to write about things I didn’t think anyone else but me would be interested in. It just turned out that they were. It was lucky. I liked it. I hope it will happen again like that.

I can write what I want, please no-one but myself, and refuse to compromise. I can be playful, and I am allowed to write badly or oddly and I am allowed to write things that won’t ever be significant to anyone other than me. I’ve noticed the more I need to budge in my professional life, the more independent and wilful I need to be in my own writing.

But. But. But.

But if I want other people to read my writing, or I want it to be published, or I want to make a living doing it, or I want to win something, or if I want it reviewed, or if I want to go to festivals, or I want to get more work teaching (or any combination of these, some of which I do and don’t want in varying degrees of importance that change from day to day) there are also compromises to be made.

So far, these compromises have been small and have been the creative kind of boundaries that have felt inspiring. So I might write a story to a theme I hadn’t thought about before, or stick to a word count when if left to my own devices I’d give the story a bit longer, or take into account the submission deadlines of a competition when planning my work for the week… these things are basic. They are things that influence my creative decisions and I am fine with that.

But what about bigger compromises? How do I balance that? How do I balance being able to earn enough to pay the rent against being able to write something that feels okay to me, and feels like what I wanted to say? I could always get a real job, and write what I like without compromise. That is always open to me.

This is connected, again, to my half-hearted planning for novel number three. Annie says she’s a minority interest, like ‘folding paper birds or collecting stilton jars’.

I think my writing is a bit like that.

Glamour + Competition

Friday, February 20th, 2009

I have ‘pulled myself together’.

I’m dealing with the facial disfigurement by growing a beard. It’s all going to be fine.

I’m shopping too. I’m going to be signing books soon, so I thought I’d buy a new nib for my fountain pen. And some ink. Shopping for bottles of ink is always really fun. It isn’t like buying shoes.

I do it online. It would be so much better if there were a shop, dimly lit, with rows and rows of little glass bottles lined up like medicine in an old fashioned chemist’s.

Here is the page of possible ink colours.

I wanted an ink to co-ordinate with the cover of the book. Because I am feeble and shallow. I can worry for a long time about the exact right colour, and what kind of message scented ink will say about me, and whether I will smudge the ink on the inside of the cover, and all kinds of other, similarly feeble things.

It is called displacement and projection and substitute anxiety.

The first person who guesses which colour I chose can have a free copy of the novel, posted to them when I get my box of author copies, which should be soon. Put your guess as a comment. When my ink arrives in the post, I will post a picture so you know, despite my occupation and reputation, I am not lying.

Theme Ingredients

Tuesday, February 10th, 2009

I often think of writing as a bit like cooking. All the ingredients are things that are already in my head, and my mind acts like a washing machine, skooshes them all about, and then I write, and bits and pieces turn up in the strangest places.

That theory means I should be careful about what I put into my head in the first place. Choose only the best ingredients. One of the ingredients this week was riding about in a car that had a television inside it. I kid you not, my friends, such things exist.

The other ingredient is here, which comes courtesy of Socrates at Chicken and Pies.

If my writing output becomes a little odd, you know who to blame.

EDIT: Probably best not to watch this if you are sensitive. Or vegetarian. Or you just like animals. Sorry.

Defrost

Monday, December 15th, 2008

I’m feeling a bit better now. I bought some new trousers and ironed them with scented ironing water.

My computer at home is unplugged. I haven’t picked up a pen outside work for over a week now.

I didn’t destroy anything. I Flirted With The Idea. That seemed to be enough.

I had some nice emails. A friend told me that Dostoevsky burned the first draft of Crime and Punishment. That made me feel better. Thank you.

My friend threw a wet towel at me as I languished in bed. He said I needed to get up and take a shower and stop moaning. I did. That made me feel better. Thank you.

I have some excellent ideas for the final editing tweaking of Cold Light.

Number three came to me a few days ago, almost fully formed. I’m excited again.

Also, BT agree that I don’t owe them any money. They owe me money. I have a credit from them. I should have new shiny tinterwebs at home before Christmas. I am going to spend the birthday of Jesus catching up on my emails.

Cause and Effect (or lack of)

Saturday, October 27th, 2007

I was reading Me and My Big Mouth and was, as is the way of the Internet, diverted to this, which I think is good. They aren’t accepting entries until the beginning of November – but that isn’t very far away.

The reason I think it is good is because the connections between the stories (I think (hope)) are going to be little impulsive leaps of association rather than the blunt cause and effect that links the incidents and accidents that exist in plotted writing.

I like wandering, almost plotless stories. They are more real to me and I have been trying to write like that. I can’t remember who said it but I have read that if you have a gun on the set in Act One, you have to have it going off in Act Three. I wonder about that. It seems very anti-realist to me. Most of my puzzling time is spent trying to work out why I do things, or don’t do them. Real life doesn’t have the calmness of a novel. There isn’t beginning, middle and end; conflict, development and resolution. Not unless you are dead anyway.

Perhaps other people have psyches that are more integrated than mine? The constant mystery of my motives – and other people’s – is one of the things that makes me want to write. Not to figure it out, but to demonstrate how arbitrary and chaotic some of our choices are. There isn’t a cause.

Perhaps I do like cause and effect, but it is a cause and effect of emotion, rather than events, which answers to a logic that I’m not grown-up enough to have deciphered yet.

And yet I do like very plotted novels. I like good crime fiction and I like thrillers too – most of these have to be well constructed and logical for them to ‘work’ in the terms of their own genre. They are, to my way of thinking, avowedly anti-realist because they are logical and comprehensible and so a kind of escapism for me.

I can’t think of any way I would like to conclude this post. I am not sure that I spelled ‘comprehensible’ right, and the little one spilled a tea-pot on my dictionary today. I am also not sure if it is ‘spelled’ or ‘spelt’ – I think it depends which side of the Atlantic you are on. I hate writing in public.

The Beginning

Thursday, October 11th, 2007

I wonder about how other writers do it – about how they start off. The beginning involves a new obsession or a voice ringing around in my head that belongs to a person that isn’t me, or isn’t only me. I write incoherently in expensive notebooks or on the back of things, or type what I am thinking.

Then I cut it up and beat it senseless – something – a form – sometimes appears – like digging something fragile and complicated out of slime. I like doing the writing better than I like having written something. Except when I don’t.

I talked to a friend who does Graphic Designing and he says, yes, you start off over here, but it wobbles over there a bit (demonstrating with beer-mats) and it might veer all over the place, somewhere else, by the time you’ve started, and I said yes, you just do it and then you sort it out afterwards, make it into something when you’ve got the stuff and all the time we are nodding furiously, not tipsy, but not articulate either.

The first, incoherent stuff is very interesting to me, because there’s a dark gap between that and what it ends up being – I can’t find the missing link in the drafts. Sometimes it evolves, and sometimes I wake up and it is there on the computer like a magic-eye picture I didn’t see before, or a burglar sitting in the best chair. I like that bit.

Here’s a bit of the writing before I have cleaned the slime off it. It will end up like a spider web but at the moment it is a lump. I can see my brain getting stuck, snagging on elastic and sausages, but I am going to make this into something.

Deep-sea fish, or that woman in her caravan, getting blacker and bigger. A black pudding sausage with a rubber band around the middle. Or someone (a woman who is older than anyone I’ve written about before) saying ‘what a disgusting thing to say,’ to a man who is her husband, but quite a bit younger than her. And she says it with the G all spiky – maybe she’s not from up here, because we say it with a C, don’t we? Discusting – like that. The regionally-challenged put the G in, but it is harder work to say it like that, the G cuts the word down the middle like a rubber band, a link in a chain of sausages. She’s saying it because he’s just told her about that wonderful thing with the angler fish, and he describes the boy one biting the girl one, growing a tube between his mouth and her womb, getting the sperms into her that way, becoming a parasite, and he says, ‘he just becomes a testicle’ and their little girl is there, fascinated, helping him make senchi discs, and mother says what a disGusting thing to say, and he’s a bit crushed and feels daft. I’d bloody love a caravan.

But really, does she know about felching?

Sunday, October 7th, 2007

…the ‘self’ doesn’t exist outside words? The parts that can’t be
articulated – that’s not a ‘self’ really, or is it? More like a rubbish heap of everything and nothing, completely contradictory and mutable, and mostly pointless.

That is what Leena said in response to a bit I wrote in my last blog post. I like it when people comment and disagree, because it gives me something extra to write about. But getting all high-falooting about writing makes me itchy. It is one more way that writing is bad manners. You should do it on your own and you shouldn’t talk about it too much in public.

Chris was writing about wondering if Nadine Gordimer knows what felching means. Wondering if selves exist without being written makes me want to say something like that. I remember ‘supervisions’ at Uni, sitting in a room with eager, well-read people saying clever, well-articulated things. It was quite like watching someone give someone else a blow-job. I remember having to press my teeth together very tightly because really I wanted to say: for fuck’s sake shut the fuck up! we’re nineteen! where’s the beer and shagging you’re supposed to get at Uni? (which of course I never did).*

By the way: if you figure out a way of saying that, in about three thousand words, during your Tragedy Paper exam, you get a first. Its a true fact.

So I struggle to hear myself say anything else about writing selves and selves writing, except I think that language makes people into people, and thought processes aren’t complete for me until they are typed out. I don’t know what I think until I see what I say, which is something I am quoting from a bit of advice that Emma once gave me. And I think the parts that can’t be articulated – the ‘rubbish heap’ is what I am most interested in. There’s a big gap between what we think of ourselves and what other people think of us, and an even bigger gap between that and what we are. I like that gap – Leena’s dark, pointless, jumbled rubbish heap. It is the place that my good writing exists in – at least some of the time.

None of which is relevant, but which is a small reply to Leena. I think. And contained no swearing or tearing at my cardigan.

*I never did say anything like that, I mean. I tried, and failed, to be earnest. The beer and shagging are my business – but it was The South and they do things differently there.

Impractical Criticism

Tuesday, September 25th, 2007

Feedburner says I have ten readers. According to the graph that is the most readers I have ever had. Thank you, it is very nice. Gratifying for my hot-air balloon ego.

Dear ten readers (would it insult you if I imagined you, for tonight, clapping your little plastic hands?), this is a bit of what I have been up to this evening:

After everything that is about to happen to her had already happened Rose will decide that it started with a girl riding a bicycle. A blonde girl, a pink bike, a white basket and a silver bell. She wasn’t there to see these details and his description had been smothered by his irritation about something else. A girl, he’d said, on a bike, and he’d had to swerve. The side of the van had caught a garden wall, paint shearing off onto the brick. A dent. It wasn’t serious. The insurance would cover it.

Rose will turn it over like a boiled sweet in her mouth and the details will divide like bacteria until his story is a living thing and something she will remember. The bike was pink, the girl was eight years old and the bell rang as she wobbled the handlebars the wrong way and bumped the new tires down the kerb and onto the road. It was her fault. See how a sentence can thicken into scene, a story into a memory? It wasn’t Rose’s fault. No, it was the girl’s, the one with lilac ribbons in her hair and white ankle socks. Bare calves speckled with mud from riding her bike through the puddles.

It was her fault he didn’t have his van that day. The scrape had to be mended. He was wary of rust. He had used his wife’s car to get to work. One bike, no van, one car. Car. Which meant they couldn’t go to the top of the multi-story car-park and withdraw into the van’s dark, grease-smelling privacy. He’d tried, but she’d shaken her head. No way, in the car. So he’d suggested a walk in the woods. And she’d taken her sandwiches from her locker and met him half way down the footpath where the trees started to clot against the light. Because there wasn’t a van (because of the girl, because of the bike, because of the kerb and the bell and the lilac hair-ribbon) they’d stepped off the path and into the undergrowth, finding a spot amongst the wild-garlic and the fireweed, brushing the leaf-mould away and lying down. And he’d kissed her open mouth and they’d begun.

All that dicking about with tenses. I’m tense about those tenses (BOOM). I am not so sure of the voice in this. I mainly stick to first person but I am trying to get intimate with third. The narrator sounds like a character all of her own. They always are, even thirds. I haven’t decided how this narrator will be yet.

I never quite understand what third person narrators have to do with the story they are telling. Not to do as in doing something, but do, as in, how they relate to. Although I am not sure how she is to do it either. She has to have a reason to tell it. It is easier to figure out when there is an ‘I’.

This is an ‘I’ that never says ‘I’ and is writing about someone else. A God voice. Telepathic. But not neutral either. She selects, and has opinions, and wants to colour your opinion. I think she’s wrong about some things too.

I need to practice more. I need to watch writers on you-tube and copy them. It is all right that I don’t know what I am doing. When I am grey, I might. I hate young people who have opinions and seem to know what they are doing. What are the rest of the years for?

Anyway, I’m not sure what I am doing with this but I know what happens next.


© 2012 Jenn Ashworth. All Rights Reserved. Photographs used with permission.Terms & Conditions | Sitemap | Contact
Website Design by 3ManFactory

Fleetwood Tram
by DaveAFlett